A fact without a source is a rumor.
Anyone can publish a claim. Few can prove one. Everything here is anchored to where it came from — a government roll call, a public filing, a candidate's own page — with a timestamp and a content hash.
That means you can verify any record we hold, and trace it back to the primary source yourself. It also means we can detect when something changes: when a candidate quietly edits a position, the before and after are both kept, with proof.
Reputation is what an AI reaches for when it's guessing. Origin is what it should reach for instead.
Verifiable all the way to your inbox
The digests we send are origin-anchored too. Every one is composed only from sourced facts, checked against the record before it goes out, and signed — each email carries a hash you can confirm was issued by Rootz, with no claim that isn't traceable. We never fabricate; where data doesn't exist, we say so.
Why "data with origin is more valuable"
Because it's the only data you can trust without trusting us. A copy of our records, stripped of its provenance, can't prove anything — validation comes back to the source. That's not a limitation; it's the point. Truth that checks out is worth more than truth you have to take on faith.